ZOOHYGIENIC AND VETERINARY-SANITARY ASPECTS OF PHOSPHONIUM SALT APPLICATION IN BROILER CHICKEN REARING

УДК: 636:631.0:636.083.37:636.5 DOI: 10.31588/2413_4201_1883_2_266_76

Authors

  • Mikhail Sergeevich Petrov Kazan State Agrarian University
  • Rezilya Akhmetovna Asrutdinova Kazan State Agrarian University

Keywords:

broiler chickens, microclimate, feeding, phosphonium salt, veterinary sanitary inspection of meat, water quality

Abstract

The study was conducted on two groups of broiler chickens at Ak Bars poultry complex: the experimental group was orally administered a 1% triphenylphosphonium ethyl carboxylate solution at a dose of 3 ml/bird, while the control group received water. Housing conditions studied generally met zoohygienic requirements. Ammonia concentrations in the air did not exceed 3.1 mg/m³, while the maximum permissible level is 10--15 mg/m³. Relative humidity was lowered during the first 4 weeks (41.0-55.8% with the norm of 65±5%) and reached the recommended level only by the 29th day (62.7±2.3%). Feeding on the farm was balanced. Feed composition was as follows: crude protein -- 22.72-18.3%, lysine -- 1.46-1.14%, methionine + cystine -- 1.11-0.85%, calcium -- 0.97-0.74%, phosphorus -- 0.55-0.49%, fat in finishing rations -- 8.17%. Watering was provided by a nipple system with drip collectors. Water source was artesian water. Monitoring of five drinking lines at different age periods showed that all nipples worked properly. No leakage was observed. Drinking water was characterized by a high color (36°), acceptable transparency (36 cm), slightly acidic (pH 5.5) and a slight excess of iron (0.5±0.05 mg/l with a norm of ≤0.3 mg/l). Veterinary and sanitary examination of poultry meat from the white breast and red thigh muscles of both study groups showed the following: pH -- 5.4-5.8; boiling test - clear aromatic broth; reaction with 5% CuSO4 -- clear; with Nessler's reagent -- slight turbidity with a yellowish-green tint; benzidine peroxidase test -- positive (blue-green colour turning brownish-brown), indicating the absence of ammonia and putrefactive decay products. The results indicate the absence of any negative effect of triphenylphosphonium ethyl carboxylate on the quality of chicken meat under the given growing conditions.

Author Biographies

Mikhail Sergeevich Petrov , Kazan State Agrarian University

Post-graduate student

Rezilya Akhmetovna Asrutdinova , Kazan State Agrarian University

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor of Department of Animal Husbandry Technology, Feeding and Zoohygiene

References

Курбанова Е. А. Разработка и обоснование зоогигиенических мероприятий по повышению продуктивности птиц // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 2024. № 2. С. 112--118. https:// doi.org/ 10.53083/1996-4277-2024-2-112-118. EDN: XYXFOP.

Анализ исследования микроклимата в птицеводческих помещениях / Н. В. Петренко, И. В. Егорова, А. С. Гайда, И. Э. Липкович // АгроЭкоИнфо. 2025. № 3. https://doi.org/10.51419/202153303. EDN: IHLMXU.

Фисинин В. И. Стратегия инновационного развития птицеводства России // Птицеводство. 2023. № 5. С. 2--8. https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2023-72-5-2-8. EDN: OAMXAU.

Асрутдинова Р. А., Якупова Л. Ф. Зоогигиенические аспекты применения углеводорода сквален и оценка качества мяса цыплят // Ученые записки Казанской государственной академии ветеринарной медицины им. Н. Э. Баумана. 2020. Т. 242, № 2. С. 23--28. https://doi.org/ 10.31588/2413-4201-2020-242-2-23-28. EDN: SZZFXI.

Рузина А. В. Бактериологические исследования в птицеводстве для подбора эффективных антимикробных препаратов // Ветеринария. 2025. № 9. С. 27--32. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2025.28.9.27-32. EDN: LYKSMG.

Бактерии рода сальмонелл в кормах для сельскохозяйственных животных / Н. Б. Шадрова, О. В. Прунтова, Г. С. Скитович, О. А. Акулич // Ветеринария сегодня. 2022. Т. 11, № 4. С. 290--295. https://doi.org/ 10.31089/9431-2022-11-4-290-295. EDN: AIEUHP.

Остапчук П. С., Зубоченко Д. В., Куевда Т. А. Роль антиоксидантов и использование их в животноводстве и птицеводстве (обзор) // Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока. 2019. Т. 20, № 2. С. 103--117. https:// doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.2.103-117. EDN: VYTALM.

Desbrusle A., Welleans A. L. Oxidation in poultry feed: impact on birds and effectiveness of dietary antioxidant reduction strategies // Poultry. 2022. Vol. 1. P. 246--277. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/poultry1040022. EDN: XBDWET.

Лукашенко В. А., Лысенко В. П., Голубов И. И. Современные подходы к кормлению бройлеров в условиях промышленного птицеводства // Птица и птицепродукты. 2025. № 1. С. 14--19. https:// doi.org/10.30975/2073-4999-2025-27-1-14-19. EDN: ZQRKST.

Проблемы антибиотикорезистентности в современном мире / Л. В. Хорошевская, А. П. Хорошевский, М. И. Сложенкина, А. А. Мосолов // Аграрно-пищевые инновации. 2021. Т. 16, № 4. С. 47--54. https:// doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2021-16-47-54. EDN: ZIKWTV.

Гарипов С. М., Асрутдинова Р. А., Якупова Л. Ф. Ветеринарно-санитарные показатели мяса птицы на фоне применения «Распол» // Ученые записки Казанской государственной академии ветеринарной медицины им. Н. Э. Баумана. 2021. Т. 245, № 3. С. 32--37. https://doi.org/ 10.31588/2413-4201-2021-245-3-32-37. EDN: ZTWXAL.

Kurbanova EA. [Development and justification of zoohygienic measures to improve poultry productivity]. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2024; 2. 112-118 p. https://doi.org/ 10.53083/1996-4277-2024-2-112-118. EDN: XYXFOP.

Petrenko NV, Egorova IV, Gayda AS, Lipkovich IE. [Analysis of microclimate research in poultry houses]. AgroEkoInfo. 2025; 3. https://doi.org/10.51419/202153303. EDN: IHLMXU.

Fisinin VI. [Strategy for innovative development of poultry farming in Russia]. Ptitsevodstvo. 2023; 5. 2-8 p. https:// doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2023-72-5-2-8. EDN: OAMXAU.

Asrutdinova RA, Yakupova LF. Zoohygienic aspects of hydrocarbon squalene use and evaluation of chicken meat quality]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii veterinarnoy meditsiny im. N.E.Baumana. 2020; Vol.242. 2. 23-28 p. https://doi.org/ 10.31588/2413-4201-2020-242-2-23-28. EDN: SZZFXI.

Ruzina AV. [Bacteriological studies in poultry farming for the selection of effective antimicrobial drugs]. Veterinariya. 2025; 9. 27-32 p. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2025.28.9.27-32. EDN: LYKSMG.

Shadrova NB, Pruntova OV, Skitovich GS, Akulich OA. [Salmonella bacteria in feed for farm animals]. Veterinariya segodnya. 2022; Vol.11. 4. 290-295 p. https://doi.org/ 10.31089/9431-2022-11-4-290-295. EDN: AIEUHP.

Ostapchuk PS, Zubochenko DV, Kuevda TA. [Role of antioxidants and their use in livestock and poultry farming (review)]. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2019; Vol.20. 2. 103-117 p. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.2.103-117. EDN: VYTALM.

Desbrusle A, Welleans AL. Oxidation in poultry feed: impact on birds and effectiveness of dietary antioxidant reduction strategies. Poultry. 2022; Vol.1. 246-277 p. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/poultry1040022. EDN: XBDWET.

Lukashenko VA, Lysenko VP, Golubov II. [Modern approaches to feeding broilers in industrial poultry farming]. Ptitsa i ptitseprodukty. 2025; 1. 14-19 p. https://doi.org/10.30975/2073-4999-2025-27-1-14-19. EDN: ZQRKST.

Khoroshevskaya LV, Khoroshevskiy AP, Slozhenkina MI, Mosolov AA. [Problems of antibiotic resistance in the modern world]. Agrarno-pishchevye innovatsii. 2021; Vol.16. 4. 47-54 p. https://doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2021-16-47-54. EDN: ZIKWTV.

Garipov SM, Asrutdinova RA, Yakubova LF. [Veterinary and sanitary indicators of poultry meat against the background of Raspol use]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii veterinarnoy meditsiny im. N.E.Baumana. 2021; Vol.245. 3. 32-37 p. https://doi.org/ 10.31588/2413-4201-2021-245-3-32-37. EDN: ZTWXAL.

Published

2026-09-03